| 翻訳と辞書 |
| Schema (Kant) ： ウィキペディア英語版 |
In Kantian philosophy, a transcendental schema (plural: ''schemata''; from , "form, shape, figure") is the procedural rule by which a category or pure, non-empirical concept is associated with a sense impression. A private, subjective intuition is thereby discursively thought to be a representation of an external object. Transcendental schemata are supposedly produced by the imagination in relation to time.==Role in Kant's architectonic system==Kant created an architectonic system in which there is a progression of phases from the most formal to the most empirical:For an explanation of the logical structure of this progression, see Stephen Palmquist, "(The Architectonic Form of Kant's Copernican Logic )", Metaphilosophy 17:4 (October 1986), pp. 266–288; revised and reprinted as Chapter III of Stephen Palmquist, (''Kant's System of Perspectives ): An architectonic interpretation of the Critical philosophy'' (Lanham: University Press of America, 1993). Also see the third appendix, entitled "(Common Objections to Architectonic Reasoning ). "Kant develops his system of corporeal nature in the following way. He starts in the ''Critique'' with the most formal act of human cognition, called by him the transcendental unity of apperception, and its various aspects, called the logical functions of judgment. He then proceeds to the pure categories of the understanding, and then to the schematized categories, and finally to the transcendental principles of nature in general."Ellington, James W., "The Unity of Kant's Thought in His Philosophy of Corporeal Nature", ''Philosophy of Material Nature'' It is within this system that the transcendental schemata are supposed to serve a crucial purpose. Many interpreters of Kant have emphasized the importance of the schematism."…if the schemata had been considered early enough, they would have overgrown his () whole work." (''Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce'', Vol. I, Book I, Chapter I, Section 4, Paragraph 35)"…if we were to reconsider the problem of Kantian schematism, much of the semantics of this century, from the truth–functional to the structural variety, would find itself in difficulty. And this is what has happened in the area usually referred to as 'cognitive studies.'" (Umberto Eco, ''Kant and the Platypus'', § 3.1)"The problem of the Schematism of the pure concepts of the understanding is the question concerning the innermost essence of ontological knowledge….The Doctrine of the Schematism of the pure concepts of the understanding is the decisive stage of the laying of the ground for ''Metaphysica Generalis''." (Heidegger, ''Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics'' (), Part 2, § 23)"The Schematism chapter is not 'confusing,' but rather leads with an unheard-of certainty into the core of the whole problematic of the ''Critique of Pure Reason''." (Heidegger, ''Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics'' (), Part 2, § 23)"…in his insistence upon the central role of time in consciousness, upon its being in fact the basic character of that synthesis of the finite and the infinite which is the self, Schelling rescues Kant’s schematism from its obscure hiding place in the text of the ''First Critique'' and gives it its proper prominence." (Professor Michael Vater of Marquette University in his introduction to Schelling’s ''System of Transcendental Idealism'', p. xvi, 1997, University of Virginia Press)"…a study of what may be the most puzzling and yet, at the same time, most significant aspect of Kant’s system: his theory of schemata." (Joseph L. Hunter, "Kant’s Doctrine of Schemata," Thesis submitted to the faculty of Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Philosophy, August 25, 1999)"The opaqueness and obscurity of the Schematism chapter—the chapter which Kant himself thought to be one of the most important pieces of the Critique, and to which Hegel paid tribute as being among the finest pages of the entire Kantian oeuvre—has often been—stressed with undertones ranging from wonder to irritation. From among the earliest statements we recall F. H. Jacobi’s assessment of schematism as 'the most wonderful and most mysterious of all unfathomable mysteries and wonders'…." (Shaper, E. (1964–65). "Kant’s Schematism Reconsidered," ''Review of Metaphysics'' 18: 270)John Mahaffy, editor and translator, ''A Commentary (Kuno Fischer ) on Kant’s Critick of Pure Reason'', Introduction, § 3, London, Longmans, Green, & Co., 1866.
In Kantian philosophy, a transcendental schema (plural: ''schemata''; from , "form, shape, figure") is the procedural rule by which a category or pure, non-empirical concept is associated with a sense impression. A private, subjective intuition is thereby discursively thought to be a representation of an external object. Transcendental schemata are supposedly produced by the imagination in relation to time.
==Role in Kant's architectonic system==
Kant created an architectonic system in which there is a progression of phases from the most formal to the most empirical:〔For an explanation of the logical structure of this progression, see Stephen Palmquist, "(The Architectonic Form of Kant's Copernican Logic )", Metaphilosophy 17:4 (October 1986), pp. 266–288; revised and reprinted as Chapter III of Stephen Palmquist, (''Kant's System of Perspectives ): An architectonic interpretation of the Critical philosophy'' (Lanham: University Press of America, 1993). Also see the third appendix, entitled "(Common Objections to Architectonic Reasoning ).〕 "Kant develops his system of corporeal nature in the following way. He starts in the ''Critique'' with the most formal act of human cognition, called by him the transcendental unity of apperception, and its various aspects, called the logical functions of judgment. He then proceeds to the pure categories of the understanding, and then to the schematized categories, and finally to the transcendental principles of nature in general."〔Ellington, James W., "The Unity of Kant's Thought in His Philosophy of Corporeal Nature", ''Philosophy of Material Nature''〕 It is within this system that the transcendental schemata are supposed to serve a crucial purpose. Many interpreters of Kant have emphasized the importance of the schematism.〔"…if the schemata had been considered early enough, they would have overgrown his () whole work." (''Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce'', Vol. I, Book I, Chapter I, Section 4, Paragraph 35)〕〔"…if we were to reconsider the problem of Kantian schematism, much of the semantics of this century, from the truth–functional to the structural variety, would find itself in difficulty. And this is what has happened in the area usually referred to as 'cognitive studies.'" (Umberto Eco, ''Kant and the Platypus'', § 3.1)〕〔"The problem of the Schematism of the pure concepts of the understanding is the question concerning the innermost essence of ontological knowledge….The Doctrine of the Schematism of the pure concepts of the understanding is the decisive stage of the laying of the ground for ''Metaphysica Generalis''." (Heidegger, ''Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics'' (), Part 2, § 23)〕〔"The Schematism chapter is not 'confusing,' but rather leads with an unheard-of certainty into the core of the whole problematic of the ''Critique of Pure Reason''." (Heidegger, ''Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics'' (), Part 2, § 23)〕〔"…in his insistence upon the central role of time in consciousness, upon its being in fact the basic character of that synthesis of the finite and the infinite which is the self, Schelling rescues Kant’s schematism from its obscure hiding place in the text of the ''First Critique'' and gives it its proper prominence." (Professor Michael Vater of Marquette University in his introduction to Schelling’s ''System of Transcendental Idealism'', p. xvi, 1997, University of Virginia Press)〕〔"…a study of what may be the most puzzling and yet, at the same time, most significant aspect of Kant’s system: his theory of schemata." (Joseph L. Hunter, "Kant’s Doctrine of Schemata," Thesis submitted to the faculty of Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Philosophy, August 25, 1999)〕〔"The opaqueness and obscurity of the Schematism chapter—the chapter which Kant himself thought to be one of the most important pieces of the Critique, and to which Hegel paid tribute as being among the finest pages of the entire Kantian oeuvre—has often been—stressed with undertones ranging from wonder to irritation. From among the earliest statements we recall F. H. Jacobi’s assessment of schematism as 'the most wonderful and most mysterious of all unfathomable mysteries and wonders'…." (Shaper, E. (1964–65). "Kant’s Schematism Reconsidered," ''Review of Metaphysics'' 18: 270)〕〔John Mahaffy, editor and translator, ''A Commentary (Kuno Fischer ) on Kant’s Critick of Pure Reason'', Introduction, § 3, London, Longmans, Green, & Co., 1866.〕
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「In Kantian philosophy, a transcendental schema (plural: ''schemata''; from , "form, shape, figure") is the procedural rule by which a category or pure, non-empirical concept is associated with a sense impression. A private, subjective intuition is thereby discursively thought to be a representation of an external object. Transcendental schemata are supposedly produced by the imagination in relation to time.==Role in Kant's architectonic system==Kant created an architectonic system in which there is a progression of phases from the most formal to the most empirical:For an explanation of the logical structure of this progression, see Stephen Palmquist, "(The Architectonic Form of Kant's Copernican Logic )", Metaphilosophy 17:4 (October 1986), pp. 266–288; revised and reprinted as Chapter III of Stephen Palmquist, (''Kant's System of Perspectives ): An architectonic interpretation of the Critical philosophy'' (Lanham: University Press of America, 1993). Also see the third appendix, entitled "(Common Objections to Architectonic Reasoning ). "Kant develops his system of corporeal nature in the following way. He starts in the ''Critique'' with the most formal act of human cognition, called by him the transcendental unity of apperception, and its various aspects, called the logical functions of judgment. He then proceeds to the pure categories of the understanding, and then to the schematized categories, and finally to the transcendental principles of nature in general."Ellington, James W., "The Unity of Kant's Thought in His Philosophy of Corporeal Nature", ''Philosophy of Material Nature'' It is within this system that the transcendental schemata are supposed to serve a crucial purpose. Many interpreters of Kant have emphasized the importance of the schematism."…if the schemata had been considered early enough, they would have overgrown his () whole work." (''Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce'', Vol. I, Book I, Chapter I, Section 4, Paragraph 35)"…if we were to reconsider the problem of Kantian schematism, much of the semantics of this century, from the truth–functional to the structural variety, would find itself in difficulty. And this is what has happened in the area usually referred to as 'cognitive studies.'" (Umberto Eco, ''Kant and the Platypus'', § 3.1)"The problem of the Schematism of the pure concepts of the understanding is the question concerning the innermost essence of ontological knowledge….The Doctrine of the Schematism of the pure concepts of the understanding is the decisive stage of the laying of the ground for ''Metaphysica Generalis''." (Heidegger, ''Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics'' (), Part 2, § 23)"The Schematism chapter is not 'confusing,' but rather leads with an unheard-of certainty into the core of the whole problematic of the ''Critique of Pure Reason''." (Heidegger, ''Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics'' (), Part 2, § 23)"…in his insistence upon the central role of time in consciousness, upon its being in fact the basic character of that synthesis of the finite and the infinite which is the self, Schelling rescues Kant’s schematism from its obscure hiding place in the text of the ''First Critique'' and gives it its proper prominence." (Professor Michael Vater of Marquette University in his introduction to Schelling’s ''System of Transcendental Idealism'', p. xvi, 1997, University of Virginia Press)"…a study of what may be the most puzzling and yet, at the same time, most significant aspect of Kant’s system: his theory of schemata." (Joseph L. Hunter, "Kant’s Doctrine of Schemata," Thesis submitted to the faculty of Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Philosophy, August 25, 1999)"The opaqueness and obscurity of the Schematism chapter—the chapter which Kant himself thought to be one of the most important pieces of the Critique, and to which Hegel paid tribute as being among the finest pages of the entire Kantian oeuvre—has often been—stressed with undertones ranging from wonder to irritation. From among the earliest statements we recall F. H. Jacobi’s assessment of schematism as 'the most wonderful and most mysterious of all unfathomable mysteries and wonders'…." (Shaper, E. (1964–65). "Kant’s Schematism Reconsidered," ''Review of Metaphysics'' 18: 270)John Mahaffy, editor and translator, ''A Commentary (Kuno Fischer ) on Kant’s Critick of Pure Reason'', Introduction, § 3, London, Longmans, Green, & Co., 1866.」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|